Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Meads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 02:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Meads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Clearly fails WP:RLN, and not enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG either. J Mo 101 (talk) 21:32, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Rugby League European Federation is an official governing body of the sport of rugby league and the Newcastle Thunder are a professional club. How are they not reliable enough to satisfy criteria. I have loads more references if you want them? (sorry I'm new to the whole wiki thing) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeStilly (talkcontribs) 21:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They're a third tier club who are semi-pro at best - far below the requirement in WP:RLN (playing in either Super League or NRL). If you can provide evidence that's he received significant coverage (i.e. not just trivial mentions or routine coverage such as match reports or transfer news), then people will vote to keep it. I was only able to find this article [1], but multiple independent sources are needed to satisfy WP:GNG. J Mo 101 (talk) 07:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative keep as WP:RLN looks like it may need reviewing. The Balkans Cup is an international event and in most other sports these generally take players across the notability threshhold. NealeFamily (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline was reviewed quite recently (see here), as if anything the notability bar was too low. Rugby league is a very minor sport in all but a handful of countries – even at international level, it receives minimal coverage aside from the major tournaments. J Mo 101 (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per guidelines NealeFamily (talk) 04:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:RLN has clear guidelines for notability requirements. subject falls short of RLN and WP:GNG
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.