Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaitou Apricot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kaitou Apricot

(Find video game sources: "Kaitou Apricot" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Unsourced after a decade and there are no sources in sight. I asked at the visual novels project and there isn't enough to constitute significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) A video game reliable sources custom Google search came up dry too. I don't see any particularly useful redirects. czar 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 00:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing here suggests a better notable article for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Lots of directory entries, no substantial content. I'm not proficient with Japanese sources, so my search did not include such and there's no jp: version to check sources. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing any in-depth third party sourcing or coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 23:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.