Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kebba Sowe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. While noting I am willing to restore it as a draft if asked. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kebba Sowe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can’t find any in depth coverage of this footballer, just stats and passing mentions. Mccapra (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Africa, and Tunisia. Mccapra (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify, young player and reasonable to expect that something might come up. Geschichte (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Nothing notable. Too short. LarryL33k (Contribz) 23:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete—Clearly fails WP:GNG. Anwegmann (talk) 01:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I find these sources to be sufficient coverage [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] Tau Corvi (talk) 17:38, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: I read them and am afraid I think they mostly are too short to constitute significant coverage Geschichte (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.