Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korneles Budam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Korneles Budam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the weak and technical passing of WP:NFOOTBALL with 40 mins of professional football, I found no significant coverage so WP:GNG does not appear to be met. An Indonesian search yielded nothing better than Tribuna and Football Database. Stats databases do not constitute significant coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 13:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes NFOOTY, and seems to have been reserve goalkeeper for a couple more games than the one he played in.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage on the subject. WP:NSPORT, which WP:NFOOTBALL is a part of, is very clear on the fact that regardless of how many professional games a player has played, he has to pass WP:GNG. The FAQ from the top of WP:NFOOTBALL clearly states as much:
Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Although the criteria for a given sport should be chosen to be a very reliable predictor of the availability of appropriate secondary coverage from reliable sources, there can be exceptions. For contemporary persons, given a reasonable amount of time to locate appropriate sources, the general notability guideline should be met in order for an article to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. (For subjects in the past where it is more difficult to locate sources, it may be necessary to evaluate the subject's likely notability based on other persons of the same time period with similar characteristics.)
Alvaldi (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, per consensus that NFOOTY doesn't really cover marginal appearances. SportingFlyer T·C 12:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The data covered has been taken from non-reliable sites, does not follows all the norms. Lacks notability too.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.