Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady of Pain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus to not keep. The "keep" or "merge" opinions make no arguments and are discounted as pure votes. Where to redirect to is unclear and up to editors. Sandstein 10:35, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lady of Pain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another fictional character with serious notability problem. The most I can find about is similar to the current source in the article, which is a single sentence, i.e., passing mention in a Kotaku. I don't see anything more in-depth that's independent, reliable and not a plot summary. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I don't remember how I came to this page a while ago, but it was absolutely the worst. I did a solid round of edits for garbage prose and splat, but in the end I don't think this deserves its own article. At best, the subject deserves a paragraph in Planescape.--Jorm (talk) 05:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). No earthly reason to delete information that doesn't need deleting. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or Merge to Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 12:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Planescape - While she is an important element to that setting, the non-primary sources about her are fairly passing. Of the two potential redirect targets, Planescape or Sigil (Dungeons & Dragons), the former is by far the better article. Rorshacma (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Usual-variety fancruft. Fails NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.