- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:52, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Leafing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly lacks notability, source listed at the bottom doesn't source anything but instead acts as self-promotion. 2ndMillennium (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No independent sources have been provided for this game. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above - TBloemink (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable game which fails to meet WP:GNG. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 14:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. What is the harm in keeping this game? I have found at least one source and added it to the article. This is at least as notable as Humans vs. Zombies.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 12:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.