Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linnéa Åberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linnéa Åberg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Definitely fails WP:NFOOTBALL and I'm seeing no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. Some may argue that playing in the Damallsvenskan carries a presumption of notability but Åberg has played fewer than 200 mins in that league so can't even really claim notability from that. Searches centred on Swedish sources mainly come back with profile pages on the usual wide-ranging football database websites and articles about namesakes in other fields, such as graphic design and reality TV. I have only managed to find one article in a WP:RS about her; this transfer announcement. The only source I found that wasn't completely trivial was this Wordpress blog entry. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - At this time not notable. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 11:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ Habitual nominator of women's footballer articles states here "Some may argue that playing in the Damallsvenskan carries a presumption of notability but Åberg". Yep - ask Number 57 and Fenix down what years the top Swedish women's league (the Damallsvenskan) was included in WP:NFOOTBALL and its WP:ESSAY WP:FPL? Did it cover the same year she had 20 caps for Sunnanå SK in the top Swedish league? Who added and who removed the top Swedish women's league from the WP:FPL essay? Regards.Hmlarson (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if we did argue that the Damallsvenskan was a FPL between 2013 and 2015, when Åberg played her few minutes of football, there is clear consensus within the Wikipedia community that a skin of teeth passing of NFOOTBALL is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively. If you do believe that Åberg meets GNG then please provide multiple reliable sources addressing her directly and in depth. Thanks. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, N:FOOTBALL on English Wikipedia is completely unreliable for women footballers. It excludes the majority of top women's leagues around the world. Thanks for demonstrating once again. Hmlarson (talk) 00:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Fails WP:GNG. No indepth, reliable coverage. Sonofstar (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.