Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Md Gani Miah Babul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lion Md Gani Miah Babul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written and sourced. Unencyclopedic. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GOOD WRITTEN WITH STRONG SOURCES. THIS article SHOULD PUBLISH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md Mahfuzur Rahman Bsl (talkcontribs) 00:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-unreliable source Owais Al Qarni (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the rules are followed of Wikipedia in this Article and Good and enough sources are given. So this article should publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by এম এস মিজানুররহমান (talkcontribs) 04:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article creator and এম এস মিজানুররহমান have just been blocked as socks of each other. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 18:48, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article is WP:PROMO. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very notable journalist in bd

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.