Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Caprice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Little Caprice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:PORNBIO and the WP:GNG. No independent reliable sources in the references. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no media coverage even in Czech largest tabloid. --Jklamo (talk) 01:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 19:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails GNG. This sort of undersourced BLP needs to go away from Wikipedia as a class. Carrite (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.