Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Avendaño

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If an editor would like to work on this article in Draft space, contact me. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Avendaño

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. Was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, but immediately returned to mainspace. Coverage is simply routine sports coverage. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Guatemala. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" ^{(work / talk)} 16:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:41, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I added sources to the page. Clearly significant young figure in Guatemalan football with ongoing pro career in Europe. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look to be routine reports about trials/youth call-ups? Giant Snowman 21:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Return to Draft probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. RedPatch (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. [1] is a database source: N. [2] is a rather routine match recap/coverage of his call-up to the youth national team: N. [3] is almost identical in content to the prior source, only having a few more details: N. [4] is yet another piece nearly indistinguishable from the previous two: N. [5] is a passing mention: N. Way TOOSOON for this kid. JoelleJay (talk) 03:10, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or re-draftify not enough SIGCOV to pass GNG. Carson Wentz (talk) 02:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.