- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Per WP:G11 by User:Athaenara. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Lucas Tavares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Despite requesting references on the article talk page, and trying to engage positively on the user's own talk page, no WP:RS content of sufficient merit has yet been provided to demonstrate notability, so I feel AfD is the best forum to deal with this. Article creator is the subject of the article and there seems to be clear WP:COI in their editing, both on themselves and on a new article created about their employer. (Point of note: A similar article on Lucas Tavares appears to have been deleted from Portuguese Wikipedia in 2011 on the grounds of self-promotion, assuming my use of Google translate was up to it.) Nick Moyes (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as self promotional advertising. He can never provide RS because someone in that job is unlikely to ever reach Notability standards for Wikipedia. Legacypac (talk)
- Delete: Effectively the subject's CV with just enough sources to verify his line of work but not to establish encyclopaedic notability by either WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG criteria. AllyD (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.