Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Elias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 04:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm Elias (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Elias is no different than any other backroom staff member at a club. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E - "Controversy leaving Southampton". All coverage is routine. JMHamo (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - He hasn't played/ managed in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. His "Controversy leaving Southampton" isn't notable either. IJA (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not a "fully professional" league player. Hence fails WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 04:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 06:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Controversies noted seems inherently non-notable, this is a routine backroom member of staff in a role that inherently does not garner widespread media coverage in and of itself. Fenix down (talk) 10:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.