Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuel Rodrigues (philosopher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Copyvio of his web site. If he were clearly notable, I would have rewritten it, but all I can see by way of publications are a large number of essays to accompany art show catalogs, and the like. DGG ( talk ) 07:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manuel Rodrigues (philosopher)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACADEMIC. No indications that he has achieved the required notability for academics. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are not even minimal signs of a better notable article and I believe DGG who has familiar analysis would also say this. SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.