Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Redaelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 12:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Redaelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination following my closure of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 20#Redaelli. feminist (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – No independent notability besides reaching an advanced age; WP:NOPAGE applies. Her stats are documented on the List of Italian supercentenarians and this lady is "too young" to be featured on our List of the verified oldest people. I recommend a redirect to List of Italian supercentenarians in case readers search for her name. — JFG ^talk 09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect This article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft like her reading and television habits, a description of her 113th birthday party, and her family tree. Her name, life dates, and nationality are best handled on the two lists they already reside on. This WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:03, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.