Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medina Pullings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Medina Pullings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Google searches show only a few passing mentions - no in-depth coverage. Article fails to establish notability, TBN website confirms only 5 episodes as a host in 2007. GermanJoe (talk) 09:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Presenting 5 episodes of a long-running Tele-evangelist show does not show notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Trinity Broadcasting Network. Possibly notable enough for a brief mention there but I see nothing to hang a biographical article on. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as She fails NACTOR & GNG - Starring in 5 episodes of a non notable show is pretty much useless in terms of WP standards, No point redirecting to TBN as she's not even mentioned there, Nothing worth merging and redirect is obviously useless, Deletion IMHO seems the better option in this case. –Davey2010^Talk 01:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.