Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movana Chen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Movana Chen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be completely reliant on artist's own Web site and works. Notability appears highly questionable, even though she was mentioned in the South China Morning Post, which is worth something, but only something. Unless notability otherwise established, delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Based almost entirely on self-published sources, fails WP:ARTIST as written. The SCMP mention that Nlu refers to is not even in the article itself... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The given references do not look substantial (predominantly primary) and searches are turning up mainly user-submitted media plus one mention in a group list of artists. Possibly WP:TOOSOON but fails WP:ARTIST criteria at this point. AllyD (talk) 08:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.