- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Museo Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Museo Publications, LLC.
- Part of a Massive spam campaign See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Museo_Publications.2C_LLC
Reference given does not confer notability. Clear Use of wikipedia as a vehicle for advertising and promotion and seems to be nothing more than an Advertisement masquerading as an article. Hu12 (talk) 08:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unfortunately spam campaigns are all too common. Nothing I'm seeing validates this article's subject as passing notability guidelines. Cocytus [»talk«] 23:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no independent coverage of the magazine. ~ DC (Talk|Edits) 03:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.