Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Glockler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed; withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Glockler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No more notable now than when the article was last deleted. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - I would not be opposed to a redirect to Saxon (band) though he has received some fairly reliable and independent media coverage for his personal life ([1], [2], [3]), and for being a sort-of elder statesman drummer beyond his work with the band ([4], [5], [6], [7]). If kept the article definitely needs better citations. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly notable per WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. No good reason given for deletion. --Racklever (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep the article needs additional citations to support the biography. Beth tils (talk) 10:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Based on the references found by doomsdayer520 (I'm not sure why I didn't find them) and the other keep !votes, I will withdraw the AfD nomination. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.