Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nukeateen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nukeateen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable band. Of the references in the article, the first is a link to a no longer existing live.com space - user created. The second is a link to a local radio show featuring music from local pub bands and the third is to an NME search of Youtube for "Teen Drive In" so just a disguised link to youtube. Google searches not finding any significant coverage. noq (talk) 09:42, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - lacks coverage in secondary sources. Flat Out (talk) 05:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Attempted promotion of this non-notable band over the last few days by a now-indeffed editor still fails to get anywhere near notability. Almost all the bluelinks in the article redirect back to it – the Daisychain label they record for is not the dance label belonging to Almighty Records that it redirects to, but I suspect it might be the band's own label. They were played once on a local radio show nine years ago, and their new album has seen literally no interest outside of their social media accounts – at present the band fall a long way short of Wikipedia's notability standards. Richard3120 (talk) 16:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.