Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ol' Skool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ol' Skool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inability to demonstrate notability to the level required by our criteria for inclusion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Two albums on Universal, one of which was a top 50 hit, meets notability criteria. Further chart placings showing up in GBooks, e.g. Joel Whitburn's The Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits and 1998 Billboard Music Yearbook, Bio in Joel Whitburn's Music Stars. --Michig (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  14:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  14:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The article needs work, but the current lone source shows that they had a charting record and releases on significant labels. Meets WP:MUSICBIO. — sparklism ^hey! 17:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.