- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OssiUrlaub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a random news item, IMO not notable per WP:NOTNEWS. The claim that this company was an airline is wrong. As I understand it, this is a travel agency who brought forth the idea of nudist flights (using chartered aircraft). Of course there were some media to pick up such an unusual subject, but there wasn't any deeper, long-term coverage. What is more, these flights weren't operated at all, so the article seems to be just speculative, again not notable per WP:CRYSTAL. Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 12:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Regretful delete: Subsequent article reported cancellation of flight. Shame, this would have added variety to the world. Folks at 137 (talk) 15:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.