Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pala invasion of Hunas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pala invasion of Hunas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Full of WP:OR & WP:SYNTH. The article fails WP:N and WP:GNG & has poor sources which fails verification. The lead mentions that this invasion was led by Devapala & his son Mahendrapala (the cited source does not mention it) however the rest of the article only mentions Devapala. None of the sources refer this event as “Pala invasion of Hunas”. Conflict with kambojas is synthesized in the conflict section too. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Afghanistan, and India. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Recently an article created by the author was deleted for being an HOAX, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander's invasion of Gangaridai. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 18:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Koshuri Sultan (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Yet another pseudohistorical article. - Ratnahastin (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete–Per nomination.EmilyR34 (talk) 05:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: can’t find any evidence of WP:GNG. The lack of reliable sources suggests WP:FRINGE. Contributor892z (talk) 08:07, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.