Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaedra Al-Majid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Phaedra Al-Majid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is BLP1E and an unneeded CFORK serving only to make readers chase links. No objection to a redirect to Qatar 2022 FIFA World Cup bid#Bribery.  // Timothy :: talk  02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Qatar. Shellwood (talk) 08:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Football. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources below. GiantSnowman 21:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found (which go into her background): [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5], among many more sources. Ironically, the nominator of this article voted to keep another WP:BLP1E AfD, saying that the nominator of deleting that article was "simply cherrypicking pieces from guidelines and ignoring the overall context". Article needs improvement not deletion m. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, passes GNG per above sources.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Although the stub article does need to be significantly improved. It's barely a one sentence stub, and it needs to be expanded considerably. CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.