Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-2012 legal history of Anders Breivik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 16:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Post-2012 legal history of Anders Breivik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content of the article has been copied from Anders Behring Breivik and consists largely of excessive and irrelevant details about Breivik's trials regarding his prison conditions. Instead of moving the cruft to a new article, we should clean up and condense the stuff in Anders Behring Breivik. Chrisahn (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Law, Terrorism, and Norway. Chrisahn (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• obvious WP:FORK delete Mangoe (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. There's already far too much unnecessary detail in these sections of Anders Behring Breivik, definitely no need for a fork recounting every minute detail of the trials. MCE89 (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 14:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - we are not a legal reporter nor a news aggregator, and this page is a fork. Bearian (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:Fork with unnecessary and honestly unencyclopaedic level of detail, we don't need to know about that one time when someone shook hands with him. Several sections are also empty - they could be deleted or filled out but this really isn't necessary. Blue Sonnet (talk) 04:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the topic is notable. The topic is controversial. There is a verdict being handed down from the December 2024 trial. New verdicts every 2 years? 2001:2020:311:B209:F8D3:B6A0:2B97:E11F (talk) 19:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.