Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary and secondary (polyamory)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Polyamory. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Primary and secondary (polyamory) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Verifiability, and may not be independently notable. One reference (to the essay that coined of the term). Delete or merge into Terminology of polyamory. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 08:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Polyamory as basic terminology that does not need its own article. — The Anome (talk) 10:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with The Anome that this is basic terminology that maybe deserves a sentence or two on the Polyamory article. Delete per WP:NOTDICT and the essay-like nature of the article. Opal|zukor^(discuss) 12:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the polyamory article is fine, nothing more than a DICDEF otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 13:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.