Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qumazani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1- Any merges should be discussed on the talkpage (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Qumazani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's already a far more complete article on this subject. We have Tatbir and don't need this one. Mhhossein (talk) 06:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 08:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• merge, which is the proper way of handling such cases. Especially keeping in mind that Tatbir mentions this synonym. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... and speedy close . I tagged the articles for merging. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw: Agree with Staszek Lem. We'd better make a redirect page out of this page instead of having it removed. Mhhossein (talk) 03:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.