Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahima Naz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After three relists, there is still no consensus whether the sources demonstrate notability and there is no indication that another relist would lead to a clearer consensus. SoWhy 12:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rahima Naz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't pass WP:GNG. Saqib (talk) 13:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep not internationally notable, but [1] suggests that there's local notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a unreliable source. --Saqib (talk) 07:19, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - local notability, no matter how well deserved, is not the same as WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Added 2 reliable sources and removed some un-cited content. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 08:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - one link is dead, another just mentions the subject as a bystander quoted for an article. One article does not create notability.--Rpclod (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete inadequate sources found to support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:50, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The one Pakistan Today article is all about her and is enough, in my view, to establish notability for an author working in a non-English area (we may surmise that more coverage exists in local languages).  Sandstein  08:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.