Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Mollet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raphael Mollet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability tagged for over 8 years. Contested PROD. Original rationale Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. remains valid as far as I can see. He came close to playing in a WP:FPL league when he played in the Swiss Challenge League but it's not listed at FPL currently so he doesn't actually pass the presumption of notability that WP:NFOOTBALL provides. Every single external link and reference is just a stats database profile page or trivial mention.

Searches in Google News and DDG provide us with a handful of passing semi-pro match report mentions and the occasional appearance in a list of players such as RTS and Swiss Info, none of which establishes notability. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.