Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohan Healy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rohan Healy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to demonstrate eligibility under WP:MUSBIO. MUSBIO#1 expects the topic to be "subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works [..that are..] not self-published, and are independent of the musician". Not the case here. Most supporting texts are self-published, or trivial (subject gets a "passing mention" when another topic is the primary subject of the supporting text). MUSBIO#2 or #3 expect chart position or major sales (not case here either). In general, neither GNG nor MUSBIO seem to be met. (While there are mentions of the subject in [for example] news articles, the primary topic of those articles are invariably about something else. This type of coverage generally fails WP:TRIVIAL - and is particularly problematic relative to WP:INVALIDBIO and WP:INHERITED. Specifically, just because we find small amounts of coverage which say things like "A is a member of BANDX", or "A is child of MUSICIANY", that doesn't make "A" independently notable). At best redirect to the article on the which the subject is a member. (When discussing this nom, I would note that WP:BLPKINDNESS likely applies).Guliolopez (talk) 23:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Guliolopez (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:MUSBIO -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and it's quite simple, as literally everything here is only for the group itself as are the sources so there's simply nothing for independennce, hence no article. SwisterTwister talk 03:38, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks the necessary sources to establish notability. → Call me Razr Nation 23:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG. BlackJackPlayer (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.