Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semtex Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semtex Girls

Semtex Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The origin of this article is questionable and so is its notability. The sources state that singer Madonna "'uses the name for pure promotional purposes. We can't really prove that we suffer a loss from that". I find that the only content that I can find all over internet is that Madonna said that she has a limited company called Semtex Girls and that Explosia, who owns the explosive Semtex sued her. I find that this does not stand on its own as an independent article and should be deleted. Those two content can easily be added to Madonna. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 11:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 13:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:52, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.