Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shåresh Ahmadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shåresh Ahmadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets WP:NFOOTY due to a single 15-minute substitute appearance in an alleged 'fully professional league' 11 years ago. Has played lower division, semi-pro football ever since and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete as an example of where notability guidelines rub poorly up against each other. NFOOTY is a bit of a meme, and permits functionally undeletable permastubs for people with parodically slim claims to notability like this. Ultimately, while I on the whole take the "passing one of GNG/SNG gives you a free pass" position, I think it fails for things like the weakest forms of sports notability. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"permits functionally undeletable permastubs for people with parodically slim claims to notability" Thanks, that gave me a good chuckle! I sense another RfC on the subject coming up shortly and we'll need input from outside editors to finally get this embarrassing nonsense struck out. Hopefully see you there. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively. If sources are found which demonstrate GNG then please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.