Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivranjani Rajye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 12:12, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shivranjani Rajye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Descendant of a politician. Fails WP:GNG Not enough WP:SIGCOV. Case of WP:BIOFAMILY defcon5 (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC) [reply]

• Keep. The coverage is adequate to pass WP:GNG, especially with articles from two Canadian newspaper. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - WP:GNG seems to be met with the sources already in the article (significant coverage in the Toronto Star, the Financial Post, Mint, and Vogue India). A quick search also reveals other coverage that could be used for sources, including The Times and the Smithsonian. NHCLS (talk) 13:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Plenty of coverage both included in the article and per search. WP:GNG is met. 117.18.230.34 (talk) 04:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.