- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Soteli Maamta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG per my sources assessment table below. My WP:BEFORE search only found trivial mentions, 1, 2, 3, 4. VickKiang (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. VickKiang (talk) 20:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ~ Has an about us page but no editorial policies. | Except for the last two paragraphs, this is a routine overview on the plot and cast, IMHO this falls under "announcements columns, and minor news stories" per GNG | ✘ No | ||
| Probably independent | Per about us at https://www.trendinginsocial.com/about-us/, the site is a blog | Decently long review | ✘ No | |
| Probably independent, though the format is press-release like | Is a blog powered by Wordpress | Routine one-paragraph announcement and image gallery | ✘ No | |
| ~ Has an about us page at https://www.lahoreinternational.com/about-us/ though I couldn't find any staff listings or editorial policies | Probably WP:SIGCOV | ~ Partial | ||
| Probably RS, also has a WP page at UrduPoint | Short one paragraph routine announcement | ✘ No | ||
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- Comment. Pinging WaddlesJP13, who previously PRODed it, and Lillyput4455. VickKiang (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Found nothing useful in a search. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I've not been able to find any good sources since I first looked for some. Waddles 🗩 🖉 21:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - on the face, looks notable, but digging into the sourcing and a BEFORE search, did not show enough to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 TT me 22:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I wrongly sorted this into the deletion sorting for films, fixed now, now is included in the TV deletion sorting list. VickKiang (talk) 22:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as I'm still looking out for reliable sources related to the subject. Also few of the included sources are adequate enough for the article existence. The show is notable soap in "Pakistan" and has received criticism for its complexed plot. Lillyput4455(talk) 12:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep because article does have independent sources solely covering the subject. It was a popular show during its broadcast and have gain recognition too in the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.88.46.151 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Because article does have independent sources solely covering the subject
- what about the requirements for reliable sources that constitute of significant coverage? Also, popularity isn't synonymous with notability. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 20:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.