Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stars Are Falling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:TOOLITTLE is typically considered an editorial problem and even stub articles may be kept. In regards to whether the band passes the threshold of WP:SIGCOV it would seem the two keep editors found additional sources putting it within the realm of inclusion. Not exactly the picture of SIGCOV but the keeps have the strongest policy based argument by addressing WP:BURDEN, albeit barely. Mkdw^talk 03:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stars Are Falling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable band article created by Metalworker14. The AllMusic entry has no review. http://www.verbicidemagazine.com/2007/06/21/stars-are-falling-the-consequence-of-revenge/ appears to be a RS, but the rest are not so fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The Christ Core interview is another RS so this is getting pretty close to passing general notability guidelines, and this puts it over the top by looking at CMnexus, where a story and a review was written by HM Magazine. This article was created by myself not Metalworker14.The Cross Bearer (talk | contribs) 18:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@3family6 and Metalworker14: I just want to see what these two editors think about the merits of the article in question.The Cross Bearer (talk | contribs) 02:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- a rather unremarkable short-lived band. Coverage is insufficient to sustain an encyclopedia article. I restructured the article a bit by removing unneeded section breaks and repetitive information, and there's really not much there. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There's the Verbicide coverage, substantial HM coverage (which might be difficult to access), and the Scene Point Blank coverage. I'm not sure if Lambgoat could be considered RS or not, but ChristCore is, though in this case the latter is an interview. I also found a Punknews.org review by a staff member. So there is enough coverage by independent RSes to warrant an article.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 03:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.