- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Stephen Keynes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This great-grandson of Darwin, and nephew of Keynes, does not seem notable in his own right. I have added an obit but cannot find significant coverage. Tacyarg (talk) 02:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I'm unfamiliar with the subject, but I see them as passing WP:NACADEMIC#3 for being a Fellow of the Linnaean Society. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. An obituary in The Times most certainly acknowledges that someone is notable enough for Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.