- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Steve Hooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:ENT, no evidence the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other SNG. The name is common, and there seem to be several more notable persons with the same name. No relevant, nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits turned up. Article has been essentially unsourced for years. Claimed award, if it exists, is not significant, itself having no GNews or GBooks hits and, it looks like, no GHits except to pages mirroring Wikipedia or IMDB. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Totally unsourced... --Cavarrone (talk) 20:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.