Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil Gupta (entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil Gupta (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual - lacks sigcov from reliable third party sources. KH-1 (talk) 05:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 05:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Reads a lot like either a resume or a deliberately promotional article. Tube·of·Light 06:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Non-notable person. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, promotional article, no notability.SUN EYE 1 06:44, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable and some content such as the list of movies he marketed have no citations. Peter303x (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No evidence of meeting GNG or any SNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam, obvious sock/meatpuppetry. This is a bad faith article that does not deserve to be considered on its merits. MER-C 08:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Marketing notable films doesn't help cross notability. Fails WP:GNG. List of these films should also be inspected. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.