Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swarda Thigale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 06:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Swarda Thigale

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly sourced (and I couldn't find additional sources), generally non-encyclopedic tone, the creator's name, Fiverrman, in combination with the photo declared as "own work" suggests significant COI issues. On top of that, the notability of the subject is borderline at best. Rentier (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non notable subject. Finding more sources that meet WP:VER unlikely.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NActor and the GNG. I doubt the IndianAFD guide will help us here. Article is very promo-y (the whole personal section could go). L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NACTOR, and searches did tutn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:55, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.