- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Tomahawks For Targets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Multiple issues (outdated, COI, SPA, promotional.....) but most pertinent is failing of WP:Music and quite likely WP:GNG. A couple of links (e.g. BBC) by virtue of a Leeds/Reading booking in 2011. Few of the links are live (e.g. nme) so all we're really left with is a tumblr post and some photos hosted on BBC Rayman60 (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. "Ahead pf their debut album's release they gained considerable attention across the music industry, as a band who may soon break into a wider level of recognition". That was in 2012, and they didn't do so. WP:BAND failure. Narky Blert (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:BAND. Unfortunately there really isn't anything substantive available to verify the information in this article. An archive version from 2012 of the NME page mentioned above [1] is completely empty. The most recent entry on the band's Facebook page, from 2015, states that they are taking a "hiatus" – it looks very much as though they are no longer active and therefore the likelihood of finding more sources to keep this page seems remote. Richard3120 (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.