Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomasz Borowiec

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tomasz Borowiec

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I appreciate the contributions of the article creator, this particular footballer only played three football matches in the II liga of Poland, failing WP:NFOOTBALL, and the sources are just stats. Geschichte (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom. Dr Salvus 16:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG & NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:NFOOTBALL. The II liga is the old name of the current I liga. OLLSZCZ talk 02:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Delete per below, seems he didn't make an appearance and thus fails NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep passes NFOOTY Dr Salvus 10:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@OLLSZCZ, Ortizesp, and Dr Salvus: - no appearances here, and even if he did make an appearance or two, there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:08, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman, does it mean that players must make more than one/two appearances for becoming notable? Dr Salvus 10:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It means that GNG is more important than SNG - so a player technically meeting SNG but failing GNG would not be notable. Giant Snowman 10:37, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

”no appearances here” 90minut.pl only shows appearances in that basic display of players who have played in the Ekstraklasa. So a player can still pass NFOOTBALL without showing up on this table. OLLSZCZ (talk) 16:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can't find anything to suggest that this player has enough significant coverage to show a passing of WP:GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article about former semi-pro footballer which comprehensively fails WP:GNG. I can't find online English- or Polish-language coverage aside from some database entries (e.g., lechia.net and 90minut.pl). Most of the Polish-language coverage of Tomasz Borowiec relates to a kick-boxer, not the former footballer. Jogurney (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.