Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomi Markovski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the sources are ever verified and found to be substantive, ping for undelete. ♠PMC(talk) 00:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tomi Markovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football coach. None of his playing or coaching positions put him through NFOOTY. Article dePRODed by creator based on number of references he added. It's hard to assess them accurately as they're all offline, but it seems to me they amount to routine transfer-like updates. I say GNG isn't met. --BlameRuiner (talk) 17:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte: please can you analyse the sources for us, given they are all offline? GiantSnowman 18:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete on the basis that I am unable to verify the coverage given it is all offline (strange) and Geschichte has failed to provide any analysis as requested, which leads me to thing they can't... GiantSnowman 18:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 10:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.