Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Goss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Goss

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD with the wording: "probably best to go through afd as there is some coverage. i would support draftifying" The PROD said: "Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of sustained non-routine coverage to pass WP:GNG (the three articles Daily Record articles are local 'Galloway News' articles hosted on the DR website)" Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or draftily - fails NFOOTBALL and GNG. Giant Snowman 21:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree tghat he does not meet notability requirements as he has not played at a high enough level or met requirements in some other way. Dunarc (talk) 23:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.