- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. WilliamH (talk) 14:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Tony Manolatos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a former communications director and former journalist, and current PR firm owner in San Diego. Even regional notability of subject is very limited. Many sources are primary or less-than comprehensive. Article should be deleted. Athene cunicularia (talk) 05:34, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Referenced in several third party sources. His award alone makes him notable. Mr. Anon515 06:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- He's referenced on his own LinkedIn page, on an archive webpage for a newspaper where he used to work, as author of a USA Today article, on a local government press release, and on another Wiki. Surely better references are needed to be on Wikipedia. Additionally, he hasn't won any awards that are widely recognizable. Finally, his page is consistently edited to include information that advertises for his new business venture. Athene cunicularia (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom, no significant references about the subject exist XinJeisan (talk) 09:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. I haven't been able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources, to meet the GNG. ThemFromSpace 01:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet our notability standards.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.