- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. bibliomaniac15 01:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Usage share of Google Chrome extensions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
i'm not even sure what N criteria this would fall under but it doesn't meet any and is rather unencyclopedic. Praxidicae (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Un-encyclopedic and WP:NOTSTATS--Editor-1 (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It's merely recreating a list generated by a commercial website that sells monitoring of browser extensions. Not notable, not reliable source, not encyclopedic. Schazjmd (talk) 16:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolutely nothing worthy of an encyclopedic here. Ajf773 (talk) 20:02, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per the above, WP:NOTSTATS. SemiHypercube 20:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete too trivial. desmay (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.