Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vartkess Knadjian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vartkess Knadjian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable businessman. Was dePRODded in 2015, so we're here. Not mentioned at Backes & Strauss and would likely be undue to mention one CEO in a three hundred year old company's history. BEFORE only indicates name drops in connection with the company, and an interview or two. Nothing to meet WP:BIO Star Mississippi 17:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 17:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 17:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Armenia-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 17:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 17:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or redirect to Backes & Strauss where his name currently appears in the Infobox. I agree with the nominator that merging more information about this person into the article on his employer would unbalance it. A man with a job, in which role he has some coverage, but I am seeing no evidence that he has distinct biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete GNG is not met properly. Yaxı Hökmdarz (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.