Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voluptuous Panic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  12:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voluptuous Panic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was removed by author without explanation. Fails WP:NMUSIC. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 07:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The entry fulfills at least a couple criteria of WP:MUSBIO. DeVault’s work with the Icicles meets MUSBIO#7, in that she is a prominent representative of a notable style (notably indie pop), and her work with Voluptuous Panic is an outgrowth that work. Bowe and DeVault’s soundtrack work for the documentary “The Death of an Imam” fulfills MUSICBIO#10 (“Has performed music for a work of media that is notable”), given that the film was nominated for an Emmy and won a top award at the BEA's film festival. Missjastersgarden (talk) 18:00, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 08:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I'm been doing} 08:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep The WP:GNG definitely isn't met (too many non-independent sources, for one thing) but they seem to squeak past WP:MUSICBIO #6. I say "squeak" because the sources for both members are week, but there seems to be enough out there to demonstrate bare minimum notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.