- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. BigDom 14:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wilbär (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable polar bear. Damiens.rf 19:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A quick google search shows coverage from institutions such as the BBC, The Guardian, Der Spiegel etc. Clearly meets notability requirements. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Extensive news coverage, continuing after his transfer to the Swedish zoo. I have added a little more info and 3 more references.--Yngvadottir (talk) 16:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Extensive news coverage Agathoclea (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.