- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wolf Frameworks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the notability guideline for companies. Sources are trivial or non-independent. Ineligible for PROD. – Teratix ₵ 04:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and India. – Teratix ₵ 04:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete short-lived startup with no notability. Broc (talk) 05:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Article, and product, doesn't seem to be notable enough. —Mjks28 (talk) 06:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Karnataka. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesn't meet WP:NCORP, overly promotional article, also the company appears to be defunct as well. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 21:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Page for promotional purpose. Fails WP:N and WP:NCORP. No evidence and sources on this company makes it not notable enough to justify an article on Wikipedia. RangersRus (talk) 13:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.