- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- World Cupp 2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only one reference, sources don't establish notability Seraphim System (talk) 10:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep It seems to have plenty media coverage[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. I don't know exactly which Indian websites count as reliable sources: The Indian Express, Oneindia (owners of Filmibeat), and Daily News and Analysis seem to be at least some of the time, and bollywood.com seems widely cited on here. The article needs a reception section though - there are plenty of negative reviews to cite. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Notable feature film. Reviewed by major publications. I have added the reception section to the article. Definitely meets WP:NFILM. --Skr15081997 (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep – Meets WP:NFP: [9], [10], [11], [12]. North America1000 02:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.