Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zacari Hughes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zacari Hughes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 20:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I am unsure whether to keep or not. Decent prose from a single source at de:Zac Hughes, I wonder if it can be expanded on from newspaper archive. In the meantime I am going with redirect to List of Rochdale A.F.C. players (1–24 appearances) (GiantSnowman) missed a trick?) Govvy (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails GNG. Insufficient sources for wiki article. // GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:55, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Current sources aren't even close to meeting GNG. Will reconsider if significant coverage is found. –dlthewave ☎ 00:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: at its current state, I don't think this page can be kept, unfortunately... Maybe, could we manage to find more information on him through some of the reliable sources? Oltrepier (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.